Tags: Antigone Essay QuestionsWhat To Put On A Cover Letter For A ResumeEssay About Christmas Day CelebrationBusiness Plan For A Startup Business PdfSolution For Pollution EssayPsc Essay 2013Essay On SamayWriting Essays In Exams
In 2016, for the first time, JCOM published not four but six issues per year.
Science communication has become widely recognised as a global phenomenon, incorporating the work of many scholars with diverse (research) backgrounds [e.g.
Bucchi and Trench, 2014; Burns, O’Connor and Stocklmayer, 2003; Schiele, Claessens and Shi, 2012a; Trench and Bucchi, 2010].
It employs tools and techniques from social and behavioural sciences, as well as from humanities; while scholars in the field are typically trained in social science disciplines such as sociology, communication studies, media studies, or in related fields of humanities such as philosophy or rhetoric [Hornig Priest, 2007; Hornig Priest, 2010].
As a maturing field of scholarly enquiry, science communication is informed by more than 50 years of research [Gascoigne et al., 2010; Trench and Bucchi, 2015].
Research in this field aims to improve our understanding of the best ways to communicate complex information, in particular to people who are outside the arena of scientific research [Hornig Priest, 2010].
Therefore, much of what we know about the science behind science communication and best practice in the field emanates from a comprehensive body of theoretical considerations and empirical research in this field.
The plurality of scholarly activity in the field is reflected in the research outputs, including the scientific articles that are published in the main journals dedicated to the field of science communication.
However, despite the increasingly global nature of science communication, research activities in the field are shaped by national priorities and cultural contexts [Schiele, Claessens and Shi, 2012a] and research outputs therefore display regional differences.
From a historical point of view, several trends and observations have been described over the last few decades: First of all, the productivity of scholars in the field of science communication has increased significantly [e.g. The analysis by Trench and Bucchi  of the geographic locations of the research contributions included in their anthology [Bucchi and Trench, 2014] reveal a positive trend in terms of both cross-institutional and cross-country collaborations — i.e.
there has been an increase in multi-authored papers where authors are based at more than one institution (increasing institutionalisation), as well as a growth in the number of collaborative, multi-country studies (increasing internationalisation).